Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gardenist
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:11, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Gardenist (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. This is just a definition. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:19, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per WP:DICTIONARY. Perhaps this could be useful on Wiktionary, but it shouldn't be here. Greengreengreenred 10:09, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not an encyclopedia article. --Shorthate (talk) 23:59, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nominator. Not a dictionary. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 00:03, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:58, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not encyclopedic. — ṞṈ™ 03:50, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.